Saturday, June 11, 2011

amore perros

images Collection: Amores Perros amore perros. amores perros gael garcia
  • amores perros gael garcia



  • dalishi
    10-13 02:45 PM
    Is it mandatory to wear business formal? I am going to get visa stamping with my wife, she is applying for H4.

    Thanks!





    wallpaper amores perros gael garcia amore perros. Amores Perros - Front cover
  • Amores Perros - Front cover



  • iwantmygreen
    04-22 08:29 PM
    Has anybody got any experience where an approved 140 was revoked by employer. The 485 is pending.





    amore perros. Amores Perros
  • Amores Perros



  • JeffDG
    01-19 08:05 PM
    You almost make it sound like did a EB3 applicant become a "slumdog millionaire" ? :)

    If they did, they could just invest and qualify for EB5!:)





    2011 Amores Perros - Front cover amore perros. Amores Perros
  • Amores Perros



  • ashwin_27
    04-08 04:16 PM
    Probably a bit of both.
    What is disappionting is that this was what was proposed as "significant" and "much more than expected" due to EB1 spillover. which leads me to think how exactly do we interpret such statements in the future??. Clearly the agency was measuring timeline in hours or days whereas all our forums and blogs measured it in months or years!!!
    Movement to Mid-2007 or post july 2007 has to wait for a long time.

    Not sure...since we are all talking about 12K and only 2 months movement. Are they cautious or we are all missing something?



    more...


    amore perros. World Cinema: Amores Perros
  • World Cinema: Amores Perros



  • excogitator
    11-23 03:34 AM
    All the Best Everyone!!! :)





    amore perros. makeup amores Perros- sound
  • makeup amores Perros- sound



  • rsharma
    07-23 09:49 PM
    I am a july 2nd 2007 filer with notice date Aug 23rd 2007. In response to my SR, I received the following reply:

    "...... There is not currently a visa available to you based upon your country of birth, your employment-based category and your priority date. Your I-485 application cannot be adjudicated until there is a visa available to you. Your case is therefore awaiting visa availability for your category and further review by an Adjudications Officer. ......."

    Many people have said that the July 2nd filers cases have been pre-adjudicated.
    However the SR response clearly says that my case will not be adjudicated untill visa # will be avalable.

    Does anybody know what is meant by pre-adjudication ?
    What is difference between adjudication and pre-adjudication?

    Thanks in advance for your replies. Any reply will be appreciated specially from the attorneys.



    more...


    amore perros. Amores Perros Movie.
  • Amores Perros Movie.



  • ch_murthy
    06-08 06:20 PM
    Hi
    I wanted to know how long it took for I-140 approval. I also got Labor by PERM filed in Dec05 and will be filing I-140, EB2.

    Thanks

    Mine filed on March 6th and got approved on May 25th.:)





    2010 Amores Perros amore perros. Collection: Amores Perros
  • Collection: Amores Perros



  • akilaakka
    07-13 11:17 AM
    Checklaw,

    By Law, you must apply for an intended travel.

    However it has been routine practice to get AP renewed because if there is an emergency and on your return if your GC is approved AP is handy.

    I am July 2007 filer. I applied in 2007. Did not apply in 2008 (had a valid h1b visa stamped in Passport which expires in Sep 2009) and re applied in 2009. No Issues.

    Thanks
    Senthil



    more...


    amore perros. Amores Perros
  • Amores Perros



  • EndlessWait
    05-01 12:09 PM
    If old I-140 has not been revoked, you are entitled to the old PD.
    8 CFR 204.5
    (e) Retention of section 203(b)(1) , (2) , or (3) priority date. -- A petition approved on behalf of an alien under sections 203(b)(1), (2), or (3) of the Act accords the alien the priority date of the approved petition for any subsequently filed petition for any classification under sections 203(b)(1), (2), or (3) of the Act for which the alien may qualify. In the event that the alien is the beneficiary of multiple petitions under sections 203(b)(1), (2), or (3) of the Act, the alien shall be entitled to the earliest priority date. A petition revoked under sections 204(e) or 205 of the Act will not confer a priority date, nor will any priority date be established as a result of a denied petition. A priority date is not transferable to another alien.
    it it was not fraudulent.. that's what my lawyer told me





    hair Amores Perros amore perros. Amores Perros Scene Pictures amp;
  • Amores Perros Scene Pictures amp;



  • eyeopeners05@yahoo.com
    06-02 12:55 PM
    July 07 485 filer with pd of July 2003 in EB3.
    EAD and AP available and can be used for AC21.
    Current H1 valid till 2010 July
    Got married after filing 485 and so wife does not have EAD etc and is on H4.

    Another company wants me to come to their company using EAD as they dont want to file h1. Can I use EAD under AC21 and switch jobs while my wife is still on H4 ?

    Is the EAD/AOS status change applicable only when going in and out of the country ? If we decide to stay in the USA till we get a GC, does it matter if I use EAD to change jobs though my wife is on H4 ?



    more...


    amore perros. amores perros images
  • amores perros images



  • blizkreeg
    01-26 12:44 PM
    Seriously, who cares that Andhra bagged 7 ranks. How on earth is it relevant to the discussion going on here? Plus this isn't a forum for Indians only(and I'm Indian).

    Stop posting these nonsense, amateur messages.





    hot World Cinema: Amores Perros amore perros. “Amores Perros” Rated R
  • “Amores Perros” Rated R



  • aarzoo
    01-18 08:40 AM
    Is the employer violating H1B requirements?? I understand legally H1B fees is the responsibility of the employer.



    more...


    house amores perros poster. amore perros. amores perros soundtrack
  • amores perros soundtrack



  • Blog Feeds
    01-27 08:30 AM
    Summary

    (LINK TO FULL REPORT BELOW)


    Congress created the H-1B program in 1990 to enable U.S. employers to hire temporary, foreign workers in specialty occupations. The law capped the number of H-1B visas issued per fiscal year at 65,000. Since then, the cap has fluctuated with legislative changes. Congress asked GAO to assess the impact of the cap on the ability of domestic companies to innovate, while ensuring that U.S. workers are not disadvantaged. In response, GAO examined what is known about (1) employer demand for H-1B workers; (2) how the cap affects employer costs and decisions to move operations overseas; (3) H-1B worker characteristics and the potential impact of raising the cap; and (4) how well requirements of the H-1B program protect U.S. workers. GAO analyzed data from 4 federal agencies; interviewed agency officials, experts, and H-1B employers; and reviewed agency documents and literature.

    In most years, demand for new H-1B workers exceeded the cap: From 2000 to 2009, demand for new H-1B workers tended to exceed the cap, as measured by the numbers of initial petitions submitted by employers who are subject to the cap. There is no way to precisely determine the level of any unmet demand among employers, since they tend to stop submitting (and the Department of Homeland Security stops tracking) petitions once the cap is reached each year. When we consider all initial petitions, including those from universities and research institutions that are not subject to the cap, we find that demand for new H-1B workers is largely driven by a small number of employers. Over the decade, over 14 percent of all initial petitions were submitted by cap-exempt employers, and only a few employers (fewer than 1 percent) garnered over one-quarter of all H-1B approvals. Most interviewed companies said the H-1B cap and program created costs, but were not factors in their decisions to move R&D overseas: The 34 H-1B employers GAO interviewed reported that the cap has created some additional costs, though the cap's impact depended on the size and maturity of the company. For example, in years when visas were denied by the cap, most large firms reported finding other (sometimes more costly) ways to hire their preferred job candidates. On the other hand, small firms were more likely to fill their positions with different candidates, which they said resulted in delays and sometimes economic losses, particularly for firms in rapidly changing technology fields. Limitations in agency data and systems hinder tracking the cap and H-1B workers over time: The total number of H-1B workers in the U.S. at any one time--and information about the length of their stay--is unknown, because (1) data systems among the various agencies that process such individuals are not linked so individuals cannot be readily tracked, and (2) H-1B workers are not assigned a unique identifier that would allow for tracking them over time--particularly if and when their visa status changes. Restricted agency oversight and statutory changes weaken protections for U.S. workers: Elements of the H-1B program that could serve as worker protections--such as the requirement to pay prevailing wages, the visa's temporary status, and the cap itself--are weakened by several factors. First, program oversight is fragmented and restricted. Second, the H-1B program lacks a legal provision for holding employers accountable to program requirements when they obtain H-1B workers through a staffing company. Third, statutory changes made to the H-1B program have, in combination and in effect, increased the pool of H-1B workers beyond the cap and lowered the bar for eligibility. Taken together, the multifaceted challenges identified in this report show that the H-1B program, as currently structured, may not be used to its full potential and may be detrimental in some cases. This report offers several matters for congressional consideration, including that Congress re-examine key H-1B program provisions and make appropriate changes as needed. GAO also recommends that the Departments of Homeland Security and Labor take steps to improve efficiency, flexibility, and monitoring of the H-1B program. Homeland Security disagreed with two recommendations and one matter, citing logistical and other challenges; however, we believe such challenges can be overcome. Labor did not respond to our recommendations.



    Recommendations

    Our recommendations from this work are listed below with a Contact for more information. Status will change from "In process" to "Open," "Closed - implemented," or "Closed - not implemented" based on our follow up work.

    Director:Andrew SherrillTeam:Government Accountability Office: Education, Workforce, and Income SecurityPhone:(202) 512-7252


    Matters for Congressional Consideration


    Recommendation: To ensure that the H-1B program continues to meet the needs of businesses in a global economy while maintaining a balance of protections for U.S. workers, Congress may wish to consider reviewing the merits and shortcomings of key program provisions and making appropriate changes as needed. Such a review may include, but would not necessarily be limited to (1) the qualifications required for workers eligible under the H-1B program, (2) exemptions from the cap, (3) the appropriateness of H-1B hiring by staffing companies, (4) the level of the cap, and (5) the role the program should play in the U.S. immigration system in relationship to permanent residency.

    Status: In process

    Comments: When we determine what steps the Congress has taken, we will provide updated information.
    Recommendation: To reduce duplication and fragmentation in the administration and oversight of the H-1B application process, consistent with past GAO matters for congressional consideration, Congress may wish to consider eliminating the requirement that employers first submit a Labor Condition Application (LCA) to the Department of Labor for certification, and require instead that employers submit this application along with the I-129 application to the Department of Homeland Security's U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services for review.

    Status: In process

    Comments: When we determine what steps the Congress has taken, we will provide updated information.
    Recommendation: To improve the Department of Labor's ability to investigate and enforce employer compliance with H-1B program requirements, Congress may wish to consider granting the department subpoena power to obtain employer records during investigations under the H-1B program.

    Status: In process

    Comments: When we determine what steps the Congress has taken, we will provide updated information.
    Recommendation: To help ensure the full protection of H-1B workers employed through staffing companies, Congress may wish to consider holding the employer where an H-1B visa holder performs work accountable for meeting program requirements to the same extent as the employer that submitted the LCA form.

    Status: In process

    Comments: When we determine what steps the Congress has taken, we will provide updated information.
    Recommendations for Executive Action


    Recommendation: To help ensure that the number of new H-1B workers who are subject to the cap--both entering the United States and changing to H-1B status within the United States--does not exceed the cap each year, U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services should take steps to improve its tracking of the number of approved H-1B applications and the number of issued visas under the cap by fully leveraging the transformation effort currently under way, which involves the adoption of an electronic petition processing system that will be linked to the Department of State's tracking system. Such steps should ensure that linkages to the Department of State's tracking system will provide Homeland Security with timely access to data on visa issuances, and that mechanisms for tracking petitions and visas against the cap are incorporated into U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services' business rules to be developed for the new electronic petition system.

    Agency Affected: Department of Homeland Security

    Status: In process

    Comments: When we confirm what actions the agency has taken in response to this recommendation, we will provide updated information.
    Recommendation: To address business concerns without undermining program integrity, U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services should, to the extent permitted by its existing statutory authority, explore options for increasing the flexibility of the application process for H-1B employers, such as (1) allowing employers to rank their applications for visa candidates so that they can hire the best qualified worker for the jobs in highest need; (2) distributing the applications granted under the annual cap in allotments throughout the year (e.g. quarterly); and (3) establishing a system whereby businesses with a strong track-record of compliance with H-1B regulations may use a streamlined application process.

    Agency Affected: Department of Homeland Security

    Status: In process

    Comments: When we confirm what actions the agency has taken in response to this recommendation, we will provide updated information.
    Recommendation: To improve the transparency and oversight of the posting requirement on the Labor Condition Application (LCA), as part of its current oversight role, the Employment and Training Administration should develop and maintain a centralized Web site, accessible to the public, where businesses must post notice of the intent to hire H-1B workers. Such notices should continue to specify the job category and worksite location noted on the LCA and required by statute on current noncentralized postings.

    Agency Affected: Department of Labor

    Status: In process

    Comments: When we confirm what actions the agency has taken in response to this recommendation, we will provide updated information.
    Recommendation: To improve the efficiency and effectiveness of its investigations of employer compliance with H-1B requirements, the Employment and Training Administration should provide Labor's Wage and Hour Division searchable access to the LCA database.

    Agency Affected: Department of Labor

    Status: In process

    Comments: When we confirm what actions the agency has taken in response to this recommendation, we will provide updated information.








    VIEW FULL REPORT (http://www.gao.gov/new.items/d1126.pdf)



    More... (http://ashwinsharma.com/2011/01/25/h-1b-visa-program-reforms-are-needed-to-minimize-the-risks-and-costs-of-current-program.aspx?ref=rss)





    tattoo makeup amores Perros- sound amore perros. Watch Amores perros Online for
  • Watch Amores perros Online for



  • lord_labaku
    12-08 02:17 AM
    1. Yes there is shortcut. Join desi software company. You will get forged diplomas.

    2/3. Not applicable. Refer 1 above

    4. Current job market is great. Obama is going to reverse outsourcing. All software job from India & china will come back to USA. But for china return job you need to know some mandarin. But no certificate needed refer 1. Above

    5. I made such a transition recently I was mortgage securities bundler at lehman bros. Now I am successful engineer

    6. Salaries start at around 150k per year even in places like north Dakota. But since engineers understand log scale, salaries grow exponentially

    Hope this helps



    more...


    pictures Amores Perros Movie. amore perros. amores perros dvd. amores
  • amores perros dvd. amores



  • leoindiano
    08-03 11:48 AM
    Guys,

    From what i gathered, It seems these 2 things could effect your processing apart from PD....

    Both can be done, if you take a infopass at your local office....

    1) I-485 fingerprints
    2) A# Mismatch on i-485 receipt, i- 140 approval notice

    For me, i didnt get FP notice from USCIS, i had to go to local office and get that done in feb. 2008.
    A# also didntnt match, So, i called POJ and they said, they open a ticket to consolidate. If i dont see an LUD in a week, i will have to go to a local office and try again...
    In July 2007, when they received 1000's of apps, for most 485 cases, they generated a new A# instead of attaching A# from your I-140 receipt/approval. Your lawyer will say 2 A#'s not a problem. But, this is definitely a problem ACCORDING TO

    Others RD, ND, namecheck which we have no control of even though you did everything right.





    dresses “Amores Perros” Rated R amore perros. Amores Perros is a Mexican
  • Amores Perros is a Mexican



  • hmehta
    09-07 11:59 AM
    Same thing happened with me - since graduation I have been in the same company for 5 yrs, still as far as labor is concerned it is considered MS+0 yrs( i was very very disappointed on learning that), but changing job to get EB-2 just for this cause is a bit of over-reaction (assuming you are happy in ur current job).

    I am in great need of some suggestions. I hold a MS degree in computer science and graduate in 2004 dec. Since then I have been with the same employer.

    Now that he is filing for my LC. Is it difficult to get through with MS+0yrs of expereince ?

    Also, at this point of time i have found other employers who is willing to do my GC in which case I will have MS+2 yrs of expereince.

    Is it worth changing employer for gaining 2 yrs of expereince for my LC.

    Does this really make my case more stronger ? or I am just OVER REACTING ? and doing unneccessary thing

    DOES THE EXPEREINCE with MS makes it better for EB2 ?

    Please let me know if there are some experts out there



    more...


    makeup Amores Perros amore perros. amores perros poster.
  • amores perros poster.



  • gova123
    08-02 05:16 PM
    I am from Tampa, I am interested in the rally, and I know for sure that one of my friend would also commit if we can work this out. let me know





    girlfriend Watch Amores perros Online for amore perros. amores perros daniel.
  • amores perros daniel.



  • ryan
    02-03 05:33 PM
    Hi Ryan,

    Do you know anyone have done that? Like you personally or anyone you know? Have they got I-140? I read that its possible to get PERM Labor done under EB-2, but USCIS gives real hard time at I-140 stage.

    Appreciate your help!

    Thank you

    The lawyers had the Ozzie degree, as well as the US CPA evaluated via an accredited foreign degree evaluator. This was back in the summer of �06. Again, invest a few extra $$ and hire a good lawyer. They can best explain the process / prerequisites to you.





    hairstyles amores perros images amore perros. Amores Perros film poster
  • Amores Perros film poster



  • yetanotherguyinline
    07-27 06:50 PM
    http://www.uscis.gov/portal/site/uscis/menuitem.5af9bb95919f35e66f614176543f6d1a/?vgnextoid=9453d59ae8a8e010VgnVCM1000000ecd190aRCR D&vgnextchannel=fe529c7755cb9010VgnVCM10000045f3d6a1 RCRD





    permfiling
    02-09 04:22 PM
    A correction, it is for 3 years infact not 4 and the I-94 stamped at POE was 1 month short of 3 years.





    optimystic
    03-20 01:46 PM
    I talk to USCIS CC/IO last week. She told me that it will take approx 90 days to assign my case to AO. So my case is still getting dust on room and not with officer. It's sucks but wait continue...
    PD: July 2001 (EB-3 India)
    RD: July 2nd 2007
    ND: Oct 10th 2007

    I have bigger problem to worry about. I am process of lay-off from employer whom I am working last 7 years. :)

    Oh..that hurts. I assume you will have to invoke AC21. All the best to you.

    90 more days? Which service center is your case located? I assume Texas? Did she explain whats the reason for the delay? Did she tell you about namecheck status? Are you planning on an Infopass? (sorry too many questions, but I think we are both on a similar boat )

    Looks like our PDs are very close to each other. Lets hope for the best.



    No comments:

    Post a Comment